The other night I was laying in bed, letting my mind wander (as I often do - also in the shower), and for some reason an interview with Peter Gabriel I read a long time ago come back to me.
It was a feature in Mix magazine on Gabriel's new (at that time) custom-built recording studio. This was around the time of "The Last Temptation of Christ," for which Gabriel composed and produced the music, so . . . we're probably talking 1989.
Gabriel talked about the creative process, and how computers were changing that process. Remember, this is in the EARLY days of MIDI, digital audio, and Madonna. Sequencing sessions often involved swapping floppies on your single-drive Macintosh Plus (if you were lucky!). Oh, how I could reminisce . . .
Back to the point. Gabriel talked about how he envisioned a system (in his studio and in his process) where he could switch from creative, intuitive, right-brained activities (say, improvising on a keyboard) to the more structured, logical, left-brained activities (creating a composition, making technical decisions, etc.).
I don't remember how he put it, but it was like having a tablet or brush or mouse or some other paradigm, and being able to use both halves of the creative process to their fullest potential. He didn't put it that way, of course - he's way smarter than I am. But it was one of the earliest times that I became aware of the different aspects of the creative process.
Which reminds me, of course, of "The Inner Game of Tennis." There is a time to be intellectual, to work at "thinking" through moves, or to physically step through moves. This is the time when our inner "coach" can be useful, observing our performance and critiquing it. But during a game (or, musicians, during a performance!), that is NOT the time for the coach to be micromanaging. During a performance, the goal should be to be completely present, in the moment, so our body (intellect, instinct, talent) can behave naturally.
Which reminds me, of course, of Aikido and other martial arts. "We do not rise to the level of our expectations, but fall to the level of our training." Which is just another way of saying, at crunch time (a match, a game, a performance), it's the "lower-level," internalized behaviors that will always be there for us. THAT'S how we know what we REALLY know. You know?
Plus I just think "So" is an AMAZING album!
Data Centers Bring the Buzz
1 week ago

4 comments:
Okay, 1- I had no idea you had a blog, read every entry and ignored the desire to comment on almost every entry, B- I love, love, love the march you sent me and Jack Arthur says it is reminiscent of Holst which is why he likes it, and 3- yes! We have to be accountable for our own creativity.....regardless of how old and tired we become. Ahhhh.....how I miss the old days, but am so excited for the greatness that lies before you. My band can be your guinea pig anytime! And yes So is an amazing bit of genius......Solisbury Hill is by far the best of his work though.... :)
Comment away, my dear! I also, from time to time, follow a certain mutual witch's blog!
I don't know Solisbury Hill - I will be getting it tomorrow! Thanks!
Miss you!
And, yes, Holst was the model for the middle section!
You have a blog? Where? Not surprised that PG foreshadowed today's e-music world. Very creative dude. X2 on the Salisbury Hill recco. Games Without Frontiers on that? Great stuff, blew Genesis off the map. Might throw in some yoga for your 'be here now' focus. :)
Yoga - totally the same concept! Hard to be worrying about life when you're focusing on a position - and sweating, in your case!
Post a Comment